State v. Everhart
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Justice.
Defendant assigns as error the overruling of her motion to dismiss at the close of all the evidence. As used in G.S. 15-173, there is no difference in legal significance between a “motion to dismiss” and a motion “for judgment as in case of nonsuit.” See State v. Cooper, 275 N.C. 283, 167 S.E. 2d 266 (1969). The rule to be applied when considering whether the State has introduced sufficient evidence to withstand a motion for nonsuit is well settled in this jurisdiction. A motion for nonsuit is properly denied when there is any evidence, whether introduced by the State or…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. FaustSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- State v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State v. RummageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- State v. FritschSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. FisherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. McCoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. LoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.