Legal Opinion
Manoj Manilal Sanghavi v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided March 27, 1980No. 79-3349PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AINSWORTH, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Manoj Manilal Sanghavi is a native and citizen of India who last entered the United States in December 1973 as a nonimmigrant student with authority to remain in this country until June 30, 1975. Sanghavi concedes deportability but asserts that the Immigration and Naturalization Service (the “Service”) improperly rejected his application for permanent residency on account of his eligibility for investor status under the Service’s regulations. See 8 C.F.R. § 212.8(b)(4) (1976). We find that the Service was justified in rejecting appellant’s application for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Yongyouth Ruangswang and Vanapar Ruangswang v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Navinchandra Mafatlal Jarecha v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Heitland v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Cecelia Pelaez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Madhukant Jinabhai Mehta v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bernard Kahlenberg v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Verity Gill, and v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Patel v. MinnixCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Yung Tsang Chiu and Su Lau v. United States Department of Justice, Board of Immigration AppealCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Putrus v. MontgomeryDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.