Legal Opinion
Yongyouth Ruangswang and Vanapar Ruangswang v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 2, 1978No. 77-2375PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Circuit Judge:
Mrs. Ruangswang attempted to qualify as an “investor” pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 212.8(b)(4) (1974). She and her husband petition for review of an order denying their application for adjustment of status. We reverse and remand.
I
The facts, insofar as they affect this review, are not in dispute. Petitioners, Mr. and Mrs. Ruangswang, are both natives and citizens of Thailand. They were admitted to the United States on August 14, 1971, with authorization to remain until January 31, 1975, the husband as a nonimmigrant student and the wife as the spouse of a nonimmigrant student.
O…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Morton v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Miguel-Miguel v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Pacific Coast Medical Enterprises v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Gregorio Perez-Gonzalez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Karl Pfaff Elizabeth Pfaff v. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Ka Fung Chan v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.