Navinchandra Mafatlal Jarecha v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, United States Department of Justice
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LEWIS. R. MORGAN, Circuit Judge:
Pursuant to new Rule 18 of the Rules of this court, we have concluded on the merits that this ease is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir., 1969, 409 F.2d 804, Part I.
This ease arises out of a petition to review an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals as provided for by Section 106(a) of the Naturalization and Immigration Act of 1952 (hereafter the Act), 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105a(a) as amended (1961),…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Bridges v. WixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Patricia Lebouef Murphy, as Administratrix of the Estate of Edward Fontenot, Deceased, Etc. v. Houma Well Service, and Eva C. Fontenot, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Foti v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Jay v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Moises Garcia-Mir v. William French SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Ka Fung Chan v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- The Hopi Tribe, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. The Navajo Tribe, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Mohamed Ali Abdi v. U. S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Joseph Paul v. United States Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.