Legal Opinion
Heitland v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 27, 1977No. 293, Docket 76-4141PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANSFIELD, Circuit Judge:
Pursuant to § 106 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the “Act”), 8 U.S.C. § 1105a, Heinz H. Heitland and his wife, Hennelore, seek review of an order of deportation entered by the Board of Immigration Appeals (the “Board”) on January 25, 1974, in accordance with a Board decision denying their applications, pursuant to § 245 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1255(a),1 for adjustment of their immigration status from that of non-immigrants admitted as temporary visitors under § 241(a)(2) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1251(a)(2), who had remained beyond their authorized stay, to that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rosenberg v. FleutiSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Foti v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Percy Briggs Wadman v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Git Foo Wong, Also Known as Chuck Sen Wong v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Ka Fung Chan v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Yongyouth Ruangswang and Vanapar Ruangswang v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- ROMALEZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2002
- Sombat Kamheangpatiyooth v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Catholic Social Services, Inc. v. MeeseDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1988
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.