Legal Opinion

Kingfisher Improvement Co. v. City of Waurika

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 13, 1923No. 14363PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from District Court, Jefferson County; M. W. Pugh, Judge. Suit by the Kingfisher Improvement Company against the 'City of Waurika and another. From a judgment denying an injunction, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBranson, J.

The plaintiff in error, the Kingfisher Improvement Company, a corporation, sought, as plaintiff, an injunction against' the city of Waurika, a municipal corporation, and C. H Edwards, the contractor, preventing construction of a sidewalk in front of “outlot 9," of the defendant city, and an assessment to pay therefor. This was denied on the trial, from which this appeal is taken. The said lot fronted on Meridian street. The eastern boundary here rf Oklahoma Territory was the Ninety-eighth meridian, and 33 feet' of ground immediately west of this meridian running north and south had been by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Voris v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Kee v. SatterfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Tracy v. NorvellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Hogan v. GrimesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. Wallace v. CableSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Siegenthaler v. NewtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Thomas v. FarrierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Connelly Bros. v. DunlapSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. City of Duncan v. RiviereSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. White v. BuzanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API