Legal Opinion

Connelly Bros. v. Dunlap

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 18, 1934No. 23450PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIÁM.

Defendants in error, owners of property on an alley in block 33, city of Lawton, which alley is a part of improvement district No. 31, sued to annul their assessments for the improvements on the alley, upon the alleged grounds: (1) That they had no actual notice of the proceedings, within the protest period, and hence lost their opportunity to make, objection; (2) that the alley was included in the district by means of fraud perpetrated by the mayor. Decree based upon findings of want of opportunity to protest, and of fraud, was entered, annulling the assessments in so far as they…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stewart v. Wyoming Cattle Ranche Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Alley v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Kingfisher Improvement Co. v. City of WaurikaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. McKnight v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barry v. OrahoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  2. Gibson v. MendenhallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API