Legal Opinion
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. Schwartzwald
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided October 31, 2012No. 2011-1201 and 2011-1362PublishedCited by 392 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Donnell, J.
{¶ 1} Duane and Julie Schwartzwald appeal from a judgment of the Second District Court of Appeals affirming a decree of foreclosure entered in favor of the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation. In addition, the appellate court certified that its decision in this case conflicts with decisions of the First and Eighth Districts on the following issue: “In a mortgage foreclosure action, the lack of standing or a real party in interest defect can be cured by the assignment of the mortgage prior to judgment.”
{¶ 2} Federal Home Loan commenced this foreclosure action before it obtained an…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by392 opinions
- Bank of Am., N.A. v. Kuchta (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. NajarOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- ProgressOhio.org, Inc. v. JobsOhio (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- Bihn v. Fifth Third Mortgage Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
- CitiMortgage, Inc. v. PattersonOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
387 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.