Legal Opinion

Cantlin v. Smythe Cramer Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 15, 2018No. 106697PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATRICIA ANN BLACKMON, J.:

{¶ 1} Smythe Cramer Co., d.b.a. Howard Hanna Smythe Cramer ("HHSC"), appeals from the trial court's granting plaintiffs Rita Noall, Cindy Miller, Patrick Cantlin, and Elizabeth Hong's ("Plaintiffs") motion for class certification in this fraud and unjust enrichment case and assigns the following error for our review:

I. The trial court abused its discretion by certifying two new proposed classes in a December 18, 2017 order, because a rigorous analysis of the record, which was supplemented following this Court's May 26, 2016 reversal of a previously-proposed class,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust FundsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Hambleton v. R.G. Barry Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Cohen v. Lamko, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Freeman v. Quicken Loans, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. Marks v. C.P. Chemical Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Binder v. Cuyahoga Cty.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. Yousef v. YousefOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. Estate of Mikulski v. Centerior Energy Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. Goree v. Northland Auto Ents. Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. Morgan v. CohenOhio Court of Appeals · 2019

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API