Hand Held Products, Inc. v. Code Corp.
District Court, D. South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
Richard Mark Gergel, United States District Court Judge
' This matter is before the Court on Defendant Code Corporation’s motion to transfer or, alternatively, to dismiss for improper venue (Dkt. No. 55). For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants the motion and transfers this matter to the District of Utah.
I. Background
Plaintiffs Hand Held Products, Intermec Technologies, and Intermec IP (collectively “Honeywell”) and Defendant The Code *642Corporation (“Code”) compete in the 2D healthcare barcode reader market, In the present action, Honeywell asserts Code’s CR2600…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Leroy v. Great Western United Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Beverly Hills Fan Company v. Royal Sovereign Corp. And Ultec Enterprises Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dickson v. ArtolaDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2020
- EmeryAllen LLC v. MaxLite IncDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2021