Legal Opinion

Fastening Devices, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 10, 1958No. C. D. 2004PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Foed, Judge:

The suits listed in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, challenge the action of the collector of customs in classifying certain imported merchandise as manufactures of metal, not specially provided for, with the consequent levy of duty thereon at the rate of 22% per centum ad valorem under paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas. Dec. 305, T. D. 51802.

Plaintiffs claim that said merchandise should be classified as nuts, nails, and studs, respectively, and assessed with duty at the appropriate…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. M. W. Zack Metal Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  2. Gorman Anderson Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fastening Devices, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  2. Fastening Devices, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  3. Fastening Devices, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  4. Reilly v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  5. S.I. Stud, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API