Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Adams v. Holcomb

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1948No. 28,420PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStare, J.

The appellees brought this action in the Marion County Municipal Court to recover the possession of a dwelling house and damages for the unlawful detention thereof. From a judgment awarding possession and damages to the appellees, this appeal is taken.

Omitting the formal allegations, the complaint is in words and figures as follows:

“1. That the plaintiffs herein are the purchasers on a conditional sales contract of certain property located in Marion County known and designated as Lot Number 4 in Christian Neerman’s subdivision of lots 63 and 67 in S. K. Fletcher’s First Brookside Addition to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Michaels v. . FishelNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. Blake v. MinknerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Kinnaman v. KinnamanIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. RushtonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
  5. Enterprise Printing & Publishing Co. v. CraigIndiana Supreme Court · 1924

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nylen v. Park Doral ApartmentsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Brennan v. ReydellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1963
  3. Davis v. Louisville & Nashville Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1961
  4. Larry Edward Flick v. Jewell ReuterIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Charles T. Hyte Community Center Ass'n of Terre Haute v. City of Terre Haute Park BoardIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API