Legal Opinion

Larry Edward Flick v. Jewell Reuter

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 13, 2014No. 47A01-1303-PL-135PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VAIDIK, Chief Judge.

Case Summary

Jewell Reuter lived in a mobile home on a small portion of her family’s land for more than twenty years. For simplicity, we refer to that small portion of land as Reuter’s land. Reuter made a home for herself; she tended the land, gardened, and installed a septic system and water lines to access a nearby well. Unbeknownst to Reuter, her land was never deeded to her. In 2010, Larry Flick, a non-relative, purchased 2.28 acres of the family land in a foreclosure sale. When the parties learned that Flick’s 2.28 acres included nearly all of Reuter’s land,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Fraley v. MingerIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Wolvos v. MeyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Reed v. LuznyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Holiday Hospitality Franchising, Inc. v. Amco Insurance CompanyIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Woodruff v. Indiana Family & Social Services AdministrationIndiana Supreme Court · 2012

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Celebration Worship Center, Inc. v. Patrick Tucker and Carolyn P. Tucker, A/K/A Patty TuckerIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
  2. William Arnold Henry and Mary Ann Henry v. Margo LiebnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Crowder Farms, LLC v. Jeff L. FlickIndiana Court of Appeals · 2025
  4. Timothy Mayberry v. American Acceptance Co LLCIndiana Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API