Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. Rushton
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtMcMahan, J.
Complaint by appellee, in one paragraph, to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligence of appellant in the operation of a train across a street in the town of Amo, in Hendricks county.
The allegations of the compliant, so far as is necessary to an understanding of the questions presented, are, in substance, as follows: Appellant’s line of railroad through said town consists of a main track, and a switch parallel to, and about eight feet north of, the main track; the principal part of said town lies north of the railroad which crosses the street at right…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Union Traction Co. v. BerryIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
- Terre Haute v. PhillipsIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. PowersIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Vulcan Iron Works Co. v. Electro Magnetic Gold Mining Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Wabash Railroad v. McNownIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Bedwell v. DeboltIndiana Supreme Court · 1943
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. GillespieIndiana Court of Appeals · 1930
- Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Sargent, Admrx.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1949
- Pio v. KellyOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Lane v. GugsellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1943
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.