Legal Opinion
Riley v. UOP LLC.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided February 13, 2003No. 01 C 8404PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ALESIA, District Judge.
Before the court are (1) plaintiffs motion in limine; (2) defendant’s motions in limine; and (3) defendant’s motion for summary judgment, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c). For the following reasons, the court (1) denies as moot plaintiffs motion in limine; (2) denies defendant’s motions in limine; and (3) grants defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
I. BACKGROUND 1
Plaintiff Shirley Riley (“Riley”) brings this suit, claiming that defendant UOP LLC (“UOP”) discriminated against her on the basis of her race, sex, and age. In…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Kimberly Hern Troupe v. The May Department Stores Company, Doing Business as Lord & TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wolotka v. School Town of MunsterDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2005
- Riley v. UOP LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003