Legal Opinion

DePinto v. SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 9, 2011No. 07 CV 2384PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

JOAN HUMPHREY LEFKOW, District Judge.

Vincent R. DePinto and DePinto Drywall & Painting (“DePinto Drywall”) (collectively, “plaintiffs”) filed an amended complaint against The Sherwin-Williams Company (“Sherwin-Williams”) and Pulte Homes, Inc. (“Pulte”) (collectively, “defendants”) seeking money damages relating to work that DePinto Drywall performed at Pulte’s Winchester Glen housing development. The amended complaint alleges that Sherwin-Williams sold defective paint to DePinto (Counts I and II), that Pulte breached its contract with DePinto Drywall by refusing to pay for…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Kolegas v. Heftel Broadcasting Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Fellhauer v. City of GenevaIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2006

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tamburo v. DworkinDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
  2. Go To Express, Inc. v. Long Road Transportation, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2026
  3. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company v. S.B.C. Flood Waste Solutions, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
  4. Kallemeyn Collision Center, Inc. v. The Standard Fire Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API