Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Pelle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 4, 2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 4, 2003, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he refused an offer of suitable employment without good cause.

Pursuant to the terms of a one-year employment contract executed May 1, 2002, claimant, the director of sales for a wireless communications services company, was to receive a salary of $75,000, as well as certain stock options and benefits. Approximately 21¡2 months later, in an apparent effort to reduce costs, the employer approached claimant about…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of FrancoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. In re the Claim of FronczakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. In re the Claim of TelegoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of CunninghamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. In re NeumanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. In re NeumanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API