Legal Opinion

Fullenwider v. Supreme Council of Royal League

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 27, 1898PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Injunction. Error to the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Murray F. Tuley, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Windes

Plaintiff in error, a member of defendant in error, Supreme Council of the Royal League, a corporation of Illinois, organized under the statute concerning corporations, approved April 18, 1872, filed his bill in the Circuit Court of Cook County, on his own behalf and that of other members similarly situated, against said Royal League and the other defendants in error, officers thereof, praying an injunction against all the defendants to prevent them from putting in force certain amendments to by-law six, containing increased rates of assessment, as set up in the bill, from suspending from…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Supreme Commandery of the Knights of the Golden Rule v. AinsworthSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  2. Supreme Lodge, Knights of Pythias v. KnightIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. In Re the Equitable Reserve Fund Life Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Stohr v. San Francisco Musical Fund SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Dwenger v. GearyIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. Supreme Council of the Royal ArcanumMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  2. Ebert v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  3. Supreme Tent of Knights of the Maccabees v. HammersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1899
  4. Head Camp Pacific Jurisdiction Woodmen of the World v. WoodsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905
  5. Robison v. WolfIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API