Ebert v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'n
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Hennepin county to recover $1,999 damages for the unauthorized cancellation of a life insurance policy. The case was tried before Elliott, J., who found in favor of defendant. From a judgment entered pursuant to the findings, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
Defendant company was incorporated under the laws of the state of New York for the purpose of transacting the business of life insurance upon the assessment or co-operative plan. In September, 1885, plaintiff signed an application and took out a policy fori $3,000, he then being fifty-eight years of age. Upon the back of this policy was a table of rates, as follows:
*118TABLE OE RATES.
Admission Pee: — $1,000—$8; $2,000 — $12; $3,000 — $15; $5,000 — $20; $10,000— $30.
Dues.
Tlie dues for expenses are $2 on each $1,000, payable annually in advance.
Assessment Rate Table.
No assessments will be made…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stohr v. San Francisco Musical Fund SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Strauss v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
- Lavalle v. Societe Saint Jean BaptisteSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1892
- Fullenwider v. Supreme Council of Royal LeagueAppellate Court of Illinois · 1898
3Cited by34 opinions
- Brownell Combs, Ii, Administrator C.T.A. Of the Estate of Leslie Combs, Ii, Deceased v. International Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Reynolds v. Supreme Council of the Royal ArcanumMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'n v. FerrenbachCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- Washington Life Ins. Co. v. LovejoyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Monahan v. Supreme Lodge of the Order of Columbian KnightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.