Legal Opinion

Nistico v. Mosler Safe Co.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 10, 1979No. 1360, September Term, 1978PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

Albert L. Nistico, appellant, filed a declaration in the Circuit Court for Howard County against appellees Mosler Safe Company and its agent, Ronald Barnett, seeking damages for an alleged defamation. Appellees demurred to the declaration on the grounds that the statements attributed to them were not actionable, that no special damages were alleged, and that the suit was barred by a collective bargaining agreement to which Mosler and appellant’s labor union are parties. The trial court sustained the demurrer on the last mentioned ground. Nistico contends that the demurrer should have been…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Jacron Sales Co. v. SindorfCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  3. Metromedia, Inc. v. HillmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  4. Exxon Corp. v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  5. Schwartz v. Merchants Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Adler v. American Standard Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1982
  2. Ungar v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  3. Simms v. ConstantineCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  4. Abbott v. Forest Hill State BankCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  5. McClure v. LovelaceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API