Legal Opinion
Simms v. Constantine
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided January 29, 1997No. 1628, 1629, Sept. Term, 1995PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOYLAN, Judge.
The appellants are Stuart O. Simms, who was at the time of the alleged acts that form the basis for the complaint in this case the State’s Attorney for Baltimore City, and Haven Kodeck, who was at the same time an Assistant State’s Attorney for Baltimore City. Both appellants were sued, along with the Mayor of Baltimore City, Kurt L. Schmoke, and the then Police Commissioner of Baltimore City, Edward V. Woods, 1 in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County by three former Baltimore City policemen, the appellees Nicholas Constantine, Chris Wade, and John Mohr, for malicious…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Buckley v. FitzsimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Edward Nero v. Marilyn MosbyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- Lopata v. MillerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- City of District Heights v. DennyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- State v. RovinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- Bunch v. RobinsonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.