Legal Opinion
Condus v. Howard Savings Bank
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 19, 1998No. Civ. 89-5131(WGB), Civ. 91-2465(WGB) and Civ. 90-2397(WGB)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BASSLER, District Judge.
A jury found for Plaintiffs on their, state law negligent misrepresentation claims against The Howard Savings Bank (“Howard”). Plaintiffs now move for pre- and post-judgment interest on the amount they are due, $1,532,575.41, which represents the jury award less amounts deducted as a result of the jury’s findings of comparative negligence and less set offs for previously settling defendants. Defendant Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (“FDIC”), acting as receiver of the failed Howard, opposes this motion, arguing that any award of interest is improper. This Court…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. BonjornoSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- White v. KnoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Ticonic National Bank v. SpragueSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Jarvis v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Nissho-Iwai Co., Ltd., Cross-Appellant v. Occidental Crude Sales, Inc., Cross-Appellee. Robert B. Weintraub, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mandile v. Clark Material Handling Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
- Waterview Management Co. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- NITE GLOW INDUSTRIES INC. v. CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- WERREMEYER, JR. v. SHINEWIDE SHOES, LTD.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2023