Legal Opinion

NITE GLOW INDUSTRIES INC. v. CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided June 1, 2020No. 2:12-cv-04047Unknown

1Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY NITE GLOW INDUSTRIES, INC., I DID IT, INC., and MARNI MARKELL HURWITZ, Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 12-4047 (KSH) (CLW) v. CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY and FOUR PAWS PET COMPANY, D/B/A FOUR OPINION PAWS PRODUCTS, LTD., Defendants. I. Introduction Plaintiffs asserted in this case that plaintiff Marni Markell Hurwitz (“Markell”) invented an applicator for flea and tick medication for animals and presented it to defendants, subject to a confidentiality agreement (the “Agreement”), in hopes that defendants would license it…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Desert Palace, Inc. v. CostaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  3. Lightning Lube, Inc. v. Witco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  4. Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. Teleflex, Inc. v. Ficosa North America Corp., Fico Cables, S.A., and Ficosa North America S.A. De C.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API