Legal Opinion

Preston v. Leake

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided November 7, 2011No. 10-2294PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge NIEMEYER wrote the opinion, in which Judge KING and Senior Judge HAMILTON joined.

OPINION

NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge:

Sarah Preston, a North Carolina registered lobbyist, commenced this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the North Carolina State Board of Elections to challenge the constitutionality — facially and as applied — of North Carolina’s “Campaign Contributions Prohibition,” N.C. Gen.Stat. § 163-278.13C(a) (2011), which prohibits any registered lobbyist from contributing to the campaign of any candidate for the North Carolina General Assembly or the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Wendy Wagner v. Federal Election CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
  2. Jimmy Yamada v. William SnipesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. United States v. Michael MiselisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
  4. John Schickel v. Craig DilgerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  5. United States v. DanielczykCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API