Legal Opinion
Jimmy Yamada v. William Snipes
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 20, 2015No. 12-15913, 12-17845PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FISHER, Circuit Judge:
This appeál concerns the constitutionality of four provisions of Hawaii’s campaign finance laws under Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558.U.S. 310, 130 S.Ct. 876, 175 L.Ed.2d 753 (2010), and related authority. A-1 A-Lectrician, Inc. (A-1), a for-profit corporation, appeals the district court’s summary judgment in favor of members of Hawaii’s Campaign Spending Commission (“the Commission”). Relying on Human Life of Washington Inc. v. Brumsickle, 624 F.3d 990 (9th Cir.2010), we hold that the challenged laws satisfy the First and Fourteenth Amendments.
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- State of Missouri v. Kamala HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Wendy Wagner v. Federal Election CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- John Schickel v. Craig DilgerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. Federal Election CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Nagr v. Jeff ManganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.