John Schickel v. Craig Dilger
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
COOK, Circuit Judge.
One sitting state senator and one prospective candidate for elected office in Kentucky challenged several state campaign finance and ethics laws, claiming violations of their First Amendment rights to free speech and association and Fourteenth Amendment right to equal protection. Kentucky argues that these measures, enacted to prevent corruption and protect its citizens' trust in their elected officials, comport with the Constitution. The district court, for the most part, disagreed with the Commonwealth. We see it differently.
I. BACKGROUND
John Schickel, the incumbent…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Reform America v. City of Detroit, Mich.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
- Brian Ames v. Frank LaRoseCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
- VoteAmerica v. SchwabCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
- AbbVie Inc. et al. v. Drew Wrigley, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of North Dakota, et al.; AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP v. Drew Wrigley, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of North Dakota, et al.; Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America v. Drew Wrigley, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of North Dakota, et al.District Court, D. North Dakota · 2026
- Ames v. LaRoseDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2023
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.