Legal Opinion

United States v. Danielczyk

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 28, 2012No. 11-4667PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GREGORY, Circuit Judge:

The Government appeals the district court’s grant of William P. Danielczyk, Jr. and Eugene R. Biagi’s (the “Appellees”) motion to dismiss count four and paragraph 10(b) of the indictment, alleging that they conspired to and did facilitate direct contributions to Hillary Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign in violation of 2 U.S.C. § 441b(a) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (“FECA”), and 18 U.S.C. § 2.1 The district court reasoned that in light of Citizens United v. Federal *614Election Commission, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 876, 175 L.Ed.2d 753 (2010), § 441b(a)…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life, Inc. v. SwansonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  2. Illinois Liberty Pac v. MadiganDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
  3. United States v. Kenneth SmuklerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
  4. McCutcheon v. Federal Election CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  5. State v. NewtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API