Chicago Lumber Co. v. Newcomb
Colorado Court of Appeals
Appeal from the District Court of Arapahoe County.
1Opinion of the CourtThomson, P. J.
Parsons, Martin & Hall brought suit to enforce a mechanics’ lien against the appellees, making the appellants, who were also lien claimants, as sub-contractors, parties defendant. The appellants severally answered, and filed cross-complaints, setting forth the facts constituting their liens, and praying judgments enforcing the same.
On the 15th day of February, 1896, Mrs. W. H.. S. Newcomb was the owner of certain lots in the city of Denver, and, upon that date she, together with the appellee, W. H. Newcomb, her husband, entered into a contract in writing with the appellee, Walter H. King, for…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Smalley v. GearingMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Henry & Coatsworth Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
- Laird v. MoonanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Cary Hardware Co. v. McCartyColorado Court of Appeals · 1897
- Kellogg v. HowesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- National Surety Co. v. Bratnober Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
- Bushman Construction Company v. Air Force Academy Housing, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
- Fowler & Peth, Inc. v. ReganSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
- Rhinehart v. Denver & Rio Grande RailroadSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
- Ketchum, Konkel, Barrett, Nickel & Austin v. Heritage Mountain Development Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.