Legal Opinion

Hill Syrup Co. v. Marine National Bank

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1924No. 18087PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiff syrup company seeks recovery from the defendant bank of the sum of $5,007.77, claimed by the company to have been paid to the bank by W. E. Sander, president and general manager of the company, from its funds without authority from its trustees, upon a debt owing by him personally to the bank, under circumstances charging the bank with notice of such want of authority and of the fact that the funds so paid were the property of the company. A trial in the superior court for King county, sitting without a jury, resulted in findings and judgment awarding to the company recovery as…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wright v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Mooney v. Mooney Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Ranahan v. GibbonsWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Young v. BorzoneWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Hoffman v. Gottstein Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Nursing Home Building Corp. v. DeHartCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  2. Hill Syrup Co. v. Frederick & NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Hill Syrup Co. v. National City Bank of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Travis v. FrySupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  5. McKay v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API