Legal Opinion
In Re the De-Annexation of Certain Real Property
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 26, 1983No. 57803PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRWIN, Justice:
Appellees petitioned the Town of Talihina to detach from the Town’s corporate limits certain property. Town denied the petition for detachment and appellees appealed to the district court pursuant to 11 O.S.1981, § 21-106. The district court ordered the property detached and Town appealed.
The only issue is the constitutionality of 11 O.S.1981, § 21-107, which prescribes the guidelines by which a district court reviews appeals in annexation and detachment proceedings. Section 21-107 provides: 1
“If the district court finds that the request of the petitioners should be granted and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Klise v. Town of RiverdaleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
- City of Bethany v. District Court of Oklahoma CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
- Alice H. Botsford and J. R. Goodwin v. The City of Norman, Oklahoma, a Municipal OcrporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- City of Tulsa v. NicholasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Red River Construction Co. v. City of NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sherbert v. City of AdaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
- Kinslow Round-Up Inc. v. City of SeminoleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- In Re De-Annexation of Certain Real PropertySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- City of Claremore v. Town of VerdigrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Kinslow Round-Up Inc. v. City of SeminoleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.