Legal Opinion

Kinslow Round-Up Inc. v. City of Seminole

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 11, 2007No. 102,524PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDMONDSON, V.C.J.

¶ 1 The questions before us are whether the trial court erred when it denied appellants’ post-remand motions to: (l)order the City of Seminole to disgorge municipal sales tax revenues collected from annexed land and supervise the refund of those revenues to appellants who had successfully challenged the annexation; and (2)award appellants attorneys’ fees and litigation costs for that challenge. We find the trial court correctly denied the motions as it did not have subject matter jurisdiction over the tax refund request and the City was immune from liability for payment of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. McCracken v. City of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  3. R.R. Tway, Inc. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  4. Town of Balkan v. Village of BuhlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  5. Stallings v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 52 v. HOFMEISTERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  2. IN THE MATTER OF THE ASSESSMENTS FOR TAX YEAR 2012 OF CERTAIN PROPERTIESSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021
  3. In Re De-Annexation of Certain Real PropertySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  4. COMANCHE NATION OF OKLAHOMA v. COFFEYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  5. COMANCHE NATION OF OKLAHOMA v. COFFEYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API