Zulcosky v. Farm Bureau Life Insurance
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtHood, J.
Plaintiff asserted a claim for proceeds as beneficiary under a life insurance policy. Defendant responded that the deceased insured misrepresented a material fact concerning his driving record in the application for the policy and, thus, recovery is barred. The trial court granted defendant’s motion for summary disposition. We reverse.
The relevant facts are as follows.
Plaintiff’s son, Mark, applied for life insurance with defendant in 1988. The application was completed by defendant’s agent-employee, who checked a box indicating that Mark had not received any traffic tickets in the preceding…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Keys v. PaceMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Paterek v. 6600 Ltd.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re Certified QuestionMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Wickersham v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Clark v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Oade v. Jackson National Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
- United of Omaha Life Insurance Company v. Rex Roto CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Oade v. Jackson National Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
- Oade v. Jackson National Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2001