Legal Opinion

Paterek v. 6600 Ltd.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 5, 1990No. Docket 115665PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Per curiam

Daniel Paterek injured his knee while running to catch a fly ball during a softball game at defendant’s recreational field. He sued on a premises liability theory, claiming that the field was improperly maintained. The complaint included a loss of consortium claim for Paterek’s wife, Elise Paterek. The circuit court granted summary disposition to defendant under MCR 2.116(C) (7) and (10), on the basis that Daniel Paterek had signed an official team roster and contract which purported to release defendant from liability for injuries occurring on defendant’s premises. Plaintiffs appeal as of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Denton v. UtleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Guardian Alarm Co. of Mich.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Moffit v. SederlundMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Hanon v. BarberMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Fuller v. Integrated Metal Technology, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Andersons, Inc. v. Horton Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  2. Holzer v. Dakota Speedway, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Andersons, Inc. v. Horton Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  4. Johnson v. Rapid City Softball Ass'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Skotak v. Vic Tanny International, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API