Legal Opinion

Wickersham v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1982No. Docket No. 66272PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blair Moody, Jr., J.

Plaintiff asserts a claim for proceeds as beneficiary under a life insurance policy. Defendant responds that the deceased misrepresented a material fact in the application for the policy which bars recovery.

Pursuant to GCR 1963, 797.2,1 this Court ordered consideration of the following question certified by the United States District Court, Eastern *60District of Michigan, Southern Division. 410 Mich 1108 (1981):

"Should the term 'materiality’ in [MCL 500.2218; MSA 24.12218] be construed to require only that a misrepresentation affect the insurer’s risk, or should it be…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Weinstein v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Campbell v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Preston v. National Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  4. New York Life Insurance v. KuhlenschmidtIndiana Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Vander Veer v. Continental Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1974

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Smith v. Globe Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. In Re Certified QuestionMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Petersen v. Mutual Life Insuarance Co. of New YorkAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
  4. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company v. Rex Roto CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  5. In Re Certified QuestionMichigan Supreme Court · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API