Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Oade v. Jackson National Life Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 2001No. Docket 114786Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partKelly, J.

I concur in part iv(a) of the majority’s opinion. Because the decedent violated his contractual duty by failing to update his medical history, true statements in his insurance application became false at the time the contract was made. The false statements were “misrepresentations” within the meaning of MCL 500.2218(2).

However, I dissent from the majority’s conclusion in its part iv(b) that there was no genuine issue of material fact concerning the materiality of the misrepresentations. Plaintiff introduced sufficient evidence to raise a fact question whether defendant would have issued the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Skinner v. Square D Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Stipcich v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Smith v. Globe Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Durant v. StahlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Oakland County Board v. Michigan Property & Casualty Guaranty Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1998

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API