Legal Opinion
City of Los Angeles v. State of California
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 23, 1982No. Civ. 66030PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GATES, J.
The State of California and the State Attorney General appeal from the judgment entered in favor of the City of Los Angeles declaring subdivision (d) of Government Code section 65860 to be “unconstitutional on its face for the following reasons: a. It is vague and unintelligible, b. It purports to intrude into matters traditionally reserved to municipalities without any apparent over-riding concern contrary to article XI, section 5 of the California Constitution, c. It is special legislation which fails to meet existing criteria for singling out one municipality for special…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Associated Home Builders of Greater Eastbay, Inc. v. City of LivermoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Selby Realty Co. v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Baggett v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Bishop v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- DeVita v. County of NapaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- DeBottari v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Mira Development Corp. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- First Street Plaza Partners v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Verdugo Woodlands Homeowners & Residents Ass'n v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.