Legal Opinion

Gold Kist, Inc. v. Barnett

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided June 1, 1983No. Civ. 3646PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BRADLEY, Judge.

This is a workmen’s compensation case.

Albert Lee Barnett, employee, was, as a result of a childhood accident, blind in his left eye. While at work on December 7, 1981, employee sustained an injury to his blind eye. The eye was surgically removed and he was fitted with a prosthetic device. Employee filed a complaint in the Etowah County Circuit Court for workmen’s compensation benefits against his employer, Gold Kist, Inc.

After discovery employee filed a motion for summary judgment. The trial court granted summary judgment and held that employee’s injury fell within the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pow v. Southern Const. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  2. Brunson Milling Co. v. GrimesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  3. Eley v. Brunner-Lay Southern Corporation, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  4. Purchase v. Grand Rapids Refrigerator Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Swift & Co. v. RollingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Middleton v. Dan River, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API