Legal Opinion

Pow v. Southern Const. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 20, 1938No. 6 Div. 191PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

Certiorari to review a workman’s compensation case.

There is no bill of exceptions. Hence, there is no question of lack of legal evidence to support the finding of facts by the trial judge. The issue here is purely one of law, namely: Was the conclusion of law correct on finding and conclusion of facts?

The finding of facts, pertinent to this review, found in third paragraph of the court’s decree, and his conclusion of law thereon, appear in full in the report of the case.

Stress is laid on the express finding that at the time and place, and while engaged in the duties required…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Cudahy Packing Co. Of Nebraska v. ParramoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Gentry v. Swann Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  3. Lane v. Horn & Hardart Baking Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  4. Texas Employers' Ins. v. JimenezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  5. Jones v. Phila. & Reading C. & I. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Trinity Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  2. Reed v. BrunsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  3. Fireman's Fund Am. Ins. Co. v. ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  4. City of Tuscaloosa v. HowardCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1975
  5. Grantham v. DenkeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API