Legal Opinion
Middleton v. Dan River, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Alabama
Decided August 15, 1985No. Civ. A. 83-T-1129-N, 83-T-1160-N, 83-T-1183-N, 83-T-1419-N and 84-T-007-NPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.
These consolidated causes are claims for workers’ compensation benefits under Alabama law. The court has diversity jurisdiction over these claims pursuant to 28 U.S. C.A. § 1382. Based on the evidence presented at a nonjury trial, the court finds that these claims are due to be granted and benefits awarded. The court also considers and grants one of the plaintiffs’ counsel’s motion for the court to enter judgment nunc pro tunc.
I
Plaintiffs Marion F. Middleton, Lonnie Hilliard, Zack Schofield, Eunice McCoy, and Clifton Smith, all former cotton…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- American Textile Manufacturers Institute, Inc. v. DonovanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Bell v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hornsby v. SessionsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
- Transamerica Insurance Company v. Ronald M. South, Roy W. Brunsmann, Walter E. Jones, Kathleen Jones, and Iris L. HannonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Harbaugh v. United States, Internal Revenue Service (In Re Harbaugh)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
- Speegle v. Dobbs Bros.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1989
- Middleton v. Dan River, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.