Legal Opinion

Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc. v. Cammarata

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided February 19, 2010No. Civil Action H-07-0405PublishedCited by 152 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND OPINION

LEE H. ROSENTHAL, District Judge.

Spoliation of evidence — particularly of electronically stored information — has assumed a level of importance in litigation that raises grave concerns. Spoliation allegations and sanctions motions distract from the merits of a case, add costs to discovery, and delay resolution. The frequency of spoliation allegations may lead to decisions about preservation based more on fear of potential future sanctions than on reasonable need for information. Much of the recent case law on sanctions for spoliation has focused on failures by litigants…

2Cases cited168 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  4. Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Mann Frankfort Stein & Lipp Advisors, Inc. v. FieldingTexas Supreme Court · 2009

163 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by152 opinions

  1. Victor Stanley, Inc. v. Creative Pipe, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2010
  2. Brookshire Brothers, Ltd. v. Jerry AldridgeTexas Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Jaime Guzman v. Melvin JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
  4. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. v. George Lobrano, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  5. Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2012

147 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API