Legal Opinion

Communications Group, Inc. v. GTE Mobilnet

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 23, 1994No. 9012-08136; CA A75184PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.

Plaintiffs James Keeling and The Communications Group, Inc. (TCG) appeal from an adverse judgment on all of their claims. We write only to address their claim for deceit, on which the trial court granted defendants’ 2 motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. ORCP 63. We review the record in the light most favorable to plaintiffs to determine whether there is any evidence from which a reasonable jury could find each element of their claim, Tran v. Tehrani, 99 Or App 141, 781 P2d 393 (1989), mod 101 Or App 216, 789 P2d 702, rev den 310 Or 243 (1990), and affirm.

At the relevant times,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Riley Hill General Contractor, Inc. v. Tandy Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Conzelmann v. Northwest Poultry & Dairy Products Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Sproul v. FossiOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Jones v. Northside Ford Truck Sales, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Lawrence v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Olson v. F & D Publishing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Tualatin Tire & Auto, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. Talk Radio Network Enterprises v. Cumulus Media Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2017
  4. Hoag Living Trust Dated Feb. 4, 2013 v. HoagCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  5. Sizer v. New England Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API