Legal Opinion

H. A. McCowen & Co. v. Gorman

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 11, 1912No. 7,689PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Prom Orange Circuit Court; Harry G. Montgomery, Special Judge. Action by John Gorman, administrator of the estate of James Simpson, deceased, against H. A. MeCowen & Company. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMyers, J.

— Appellee brought this action against appellant to recover damages for the alleged negligent killing of J ames Simpson. The complaint was in three paragraphs. A demurrer for want of facts to each paragraph was overruled, whereupon appellant answered by a general denial. There was a trial by jury, resulting in a general verdict for appellee. Answers to fifty-six interrogatories were returned. Appellant’s motion for judgment on the answers to interrogatories, and its motion for a new trial, were overruled. The errors assigned and relied on are that the court erred in overruling the separate…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railway Co v. WatsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Diamond Block Coal Co. v. CuthbertsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Hamilton v. LoveIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Balzer v. WaringIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Robertson v. FordIndiana Supreme Court · 1905

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Indiana Manufacturing Co. v. CoughlinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Kokomo Steel & Wire Co. v. CarsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Stimson v. KruegerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API