Legal Opinion

Balzer v. Waring

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1911No. 21,874PublishedCited by 41 opinions

From Huntington Circuit Court; Charles E. Sturgis, Special Judge. Action by Mayme Balzer against Larry C. Waring and another. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

This is an action for personal injuries caused by the failure of appellees to guard a certain power shaft in their factory, pursuant to the provisions of §9 of the factory act of 1899 (Acts 1899 p. 231, §8029 Burns 1908), by reason *587of which failure of duty appellant was permanently injured. After issue formed by general denial, the cause was submitted to a jury for trial. At the close of appellant’s testimony, the court, on motion of appellees, peremptorily instructed the jury to return a verdict for appellees, which was done. Appellant relies upon this action of the trial court, and on…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. StoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Davis Coal Co. v. PollandIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Monteith v. Kokomo Wood Enameling Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1902
  4. United States Cement Co. v. CooperIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Coy v. Indianapolis Gas Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1897

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Whitaker, Admr. v. BorntragerIndiana Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Chicago & Erie Railroad v. DiniusIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. ClarkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. HussIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932
  5. Baker v. WESTINGHOUSE ELEC. CORP. & MONSANTO CO.Indiana Supreme Court · 1994

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API