Legal Opinion

Robertson v. Ford

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1905No. 20,517PublishedCited by 36 opinions

Erom Howard Circuit Court; James F. Flliott, Judge. Action by Daniel J. Robertson against Charles A. Eord as surviving partner of the firm of Eord & Donnelly. Erom a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Transferred from Appellate Court under §1337u Burns 1901, Acts 1901, p. 590.

1Opinion of the CourtJordan, J.

Appellant sued Charles A. Eord and William Donnelly, partners doing business at Kokomo, Indiana, under the firm name of Eord & Donnelly, to recover for personal injuries received while in the employ of said partners, by reason of alleged negligence. A demurrer for want of facts was sustained to the complaint, and upon appellant’s electing to abide by his pleading, judgment was rendered against him for costs. After the judgment was rendered, but prior to this appeal, William Donnelly died, and the appeal is prosecuted against Charles A. Eord, as a surviving partner, under the rule affirmed in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Knisley v. . PrattNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LightheiserIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Glens Falls Portland Cement Co. v. Travelers' InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  5. Monteith v. Kokomo Wood Enameling Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1902

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Laporte Carriage Co. v. SullenderIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Inland Steel Co. v. YedinakIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  3. United States Cement Co. v. CooperIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Balzer v. WaringIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  5. State v. EnsleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1912

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API