Legal Opinion

Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Goad

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 6, 1926No. 16411PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RUTH, C.

Plaintiff and defendant will be designated as they appeared in the trial court.

Plaintiff brought its action to recover something in excess of $7,000, paid as taxes under protest, and an agreed judgment was entered for plaintiff for all save and except $402.80, being, as alleged by plaintiff, an excess -and illegal levy to care for the sinking fund in school district No. 72 (city of Durant), Bryan county.

It is contended by plaintiff that the school district in question had outstanding bonds of $185,000; that it was mandatory .that an annual levy be made to create a sinking…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Oklahoma News Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Campbell v. State Ex Rel. BrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. St. Louis & S. F. R. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. In Re UngerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  5. Nelson v. Oklahoma City & W. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. McVicker v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMM'RS OF COUNTY OF CADDOSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  2. C. D. Coggeshall & Co. v. SmileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. In Re Gypsy Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Excise Board v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Protest of Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API