Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Gupta

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 21, 1997No. 64A03-9611-CV-401PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STATON, Judge.

Charlotte Johnson appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Ar-jum Gupta, M.D. She presents two issues for our review which we restate as follows:

I. Whether the Indiana Medical Malpractice Act’s occurrence-based statute of limitations violates Article 1, Section 12 of the Indiana Constitution.

II. Whether the Indiana Medical Malpractice Act’s occurrence-based statute of limitations violates Article 1, Section 23 of the Indiana Constitution.

*829We affirm.

The facts most favorable to Johnson, the non-movant, reveal that Gupta performed a hemorrhoidectomy and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Johnson v. St. Vincent Hospital, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Collins v. DayIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Dague v. Piper Aircraft Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Stephenson v. LedbetterIndiana Supreme Court · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Martin v. RicheyIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Van Dusen v. StottsIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Mayfield v. Continental Rehabilitation Hospital of Terre HauteIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Johnson v. GuptaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Johnson v. GuptaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API