Martinson v. Brooks Equipment Leasing, Inc.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.
The issues on appeal are two:
1. Were the claimed “extras” included within the April 15th contract?
2. Was the imposition of $2,000 in liquidated damages unjustified?
It appears that at the time the contract was signed, April 15, 1965, the plans and specifications actually used to build the pool were not in existence. The only plans and specifications existing were those which accompanied the bid materials sent to interested contractors. These plans and specifications prepared by respondent’s engineer, William Dries, called for an all metal pool with a diatomaceous earth filter system that was…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Georgiades v. GlickmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Cutler-Hammer, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Brothers v. Bank of KaukaunaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
- Johnson v. PughWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Seifert v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Twin River Construction Co. v. Public Water District No. 6Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Koenings v. Joseph Schlitz Brewing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
- S & M Rotogravure Service, Inc. v. BaerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- CNH America LLC v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Vonasek v. Hirsch and Stevens, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.