Scott v. King
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtKurt S. Odenwald, Judge
Introduction
Michael Scott (“Scott”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered after a bench trial. Scott sued his landlord, Janice King (“King”), for specific performance to enforce a sale agreement for the leased property. King counterclaimed for unjust enrichment and ejectment, arguing that Scott occupied her property without paying rent. The trial court found in King’s favor on both Scott’s petition and King’s counterclaims. On appeal, all five of Scott’s points on appeal fail to comply with Rule 84.04(d)(1),1 but we exercise our discretion to review Scott’s first two points ex…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Catron v. Columbia Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1987
- Watters v. Travel Guard InternationalMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- Twin River Construction Co. v. Public Water District No. 6Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Modine Manufacturing Company v. CarlockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Nichols v. Belleview R-III School DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- Brown v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- Rita Lynne Terpstra v. State of Missouri, Department of Labor and Industrial Relations CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
- Bramer v. AbstonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Alma J. Carruthers v. Serenity Memorial Funeral and Cremation Service, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.