Ruden v. Dalkin
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPollby, J.
It is alleged in plaintiff’s complaint that on the 3d day of August, 1925, defendant executed and delivered' to the First State Bank of Sioux Falls his promissory note for $300, and that said sum of money has not been paid.
It is further alleged that on the 22d day of October, 1926, said bank suspended business and was turned over to plaintiff, who brings this action as superintendent of banks. Thereafter, Dworsky & Dalkin, Incorporated, procured an order in the circuit court permitting it to intervené in said action, and pursuant to said order filed its complaint in intervention. In this…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Schaeffer v. RudenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
- Holman v. Commercial & Savings BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
3Cited by4 opinions
- Schrank v. Pennington County Board of CommissionersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Waverly Independent Consolidated School District No. 1 v. YoungSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
- Schrank v. Pennington County Board of CommissionersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Schrank v. Pennington County Board of CommissionersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998