Holman v. Commercial & Savings Bank
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBurch, J.
This action is brought for the purpose of having a certain note adjudged paid and satisfied, and to compel defendants to cancel and surrender said note. Defendants counterclaim and ask judgment on the note. Judgment was rendered as prayed for in the complaint, and defendants appeal from the judgment and an order denying new trial.
For a proper understanding of the questions involved it is necessary to have in mind the relation of the several parties tO' the transaction involved on the.date of the transaction and subsequent thereto. Ed Holman, plaintiff, was' a farmer and stock raiser living…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Matters v. Custer CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Ruden v. DalkinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
- Jacobson v. RudenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
- Waverly Independent Consolidated School District No. 1 v. YoungSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
- First National Bank v. ClementsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1935